Path: netnews.worldnet.att.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!news.good.net!news.good.net!usenet73.supernews.com!usenet65.supernews.com!news From: grady@northcoast.com (Grady Ward) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: RTC: Obstruction of Justice in Swedish NOTs Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 19:12:51 GMT Organization: All USENET -- http://www.net-link.com Lines: 69 Message-ID: <328a18e6.950645@207.126.101.77> References: <3288b812.204503@207.126.101.77> <56auha$nap@fcnews.fc.hp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.4.102.135 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-No-Archive: Yes On 12 Nov 1996 22:42:50 GMT, perry@fc.hp.com (Perry Scott) wrote: >Operation Foot Bullet. For their work in "predicting" that the Swedish >NOTs were forgeries, Hogan and Kobrin should get an honorary SP1. I >will be making the motion at the next ARSCC-EC meeting. (Hey, if Grady > Grady Ward 3449 Martha Court Arcata, CA 95521-4884 Telephone +1 707 826 7712 E-mail grady@northcoast.com November 13, 1996 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail Thomas R. Hogan 60 South Market Street, Suite 1125 San Jose, California 95113-2332 Re: Religious Technology Center, Inc. v. Grady Ward No. C 96- 20207 Dear Mr. Hogan, Pursuant to Local Rule 7-10(b) I will be making an expedited motion(s) before Judge Whyte and Judge Infante on Monday, November 18, 1996 to (1) continue the December 6, 1996 motion to Amend Counterclaim to early January, 1997; (2) continue the November 25, 1996 motions for protective order, compel, and discovery costs before Judge Infante; (3) to supplement my Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(d); and (4) to supplement my Replies before Judge Infante pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(d). The events that have occurred since the time of filing of the relevant motions include the discovery of the theft and forgery of NOTs in Sweden, that, taken with your October 25, 1996 letter to the court asking to examine my NOTs exhibit A because the "Plaintiff believes these are forgeries" constitutes strong evidence that the plaintiff has committed further predicate acts under federal Racketeering statutes of 18 U.S.C. 1503 et seq. (Obstruction of Justice). As I have with Madame Kobrin, I am asking you as a percipient witness in the above matter to voluntarily withdraw from this litigation pursuant to Model Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102(A) (1979). Very truly yours, Grady Ward, pro se