>From oracle@dodo.pp.se  Wed Oct  2 21:33:41 1996
Received: from dialup109-6-11.swipnet.se (dialup109-6-11.swipnet.se [130.244.109
.131])
          by gaia.swip.net (8.7.6swip/8.7.3) with SMTP
          id VAA20156;
          Wed, 2 Oct 1996 21:33:21 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3252C313.4A9B@dodo.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 21:31:31 +0200
From: Zenon Panoussis <oracle@dodo.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 [nl] (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
CC: hkk@netcom.com, dm@dma.se, oracle@dodo.pp.se
Subject: Wednesday
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001

CC Magnusson & Kobrin


Yesterday I advised the lackey Magnusson that he had time
until this afternoon to stop me from going to the parliament
with the NOTs. He failed. This afternoon I went to the
parliament with the NOTs. Not 349 copies as I said I'd do,
just one. The parliament is copying.

In the parliament I met the chief of security. He said it
is the first time they have ever had a theft of documents.
It seems to be an insider job and he was rather preoccupied.
The theft has been reported to the police.

I also learned that at some point today, the CoS lawyers had the
incredible nerve to go to the parliament and demand that the
NOTs be kept secret. In other words: the representatives of the
thieves went to the bestolen to ask the bestolen to round-up the
work of the thieves. If that is not fresh, I don't know what is.
I wonder what they pay them, so that they humiliate themselves
in such a way. Needless to say, they were very politely shown to
the door.

I learned that the car that was parked in the corner yesterday
was replaced by another, which in turn was replaced by a third
one, all with guys sitting in them. Then the guys left the last
car, maybe to have a coffee. Then somebody smashed the side
window of it and police arrived. There were binoculars in the
car, and notes of car registration plates and of people coming
and leaving. There had also been a camera in the car, that maybe
was stolen and maybe not. I couldn't get any information from the
police, their computers were down. I was told that the guys in
the last car had guns by someone that saw them. Police are
practically the only ones that carry guns, at least visibly. I
imagine that criminals and PIs, even if they have guns, would
keep them out of sight. Somebody who should know placed this
whole thing in conjunction with a recent big hash seizure, saying
that one of the suspects in it lives on my block. Thus, the
surveillance could be unconnected to me. It's hard to know. It
still could be PIs, and the affair could indicate that I have
an unkown friend with a sledgehammer. I'll call the police
tomorrow and ask them.

I found my disappeared copy of file attachement 37. I had
actually misplaced it. The CoS is hereby cleared from the
suspicion of having stolen it, at least so far.

Now the bad news. The bailiff pronounced a decision today saying
that the matter of whether the OTs and NOTs have been made public
or not is not for her to solve, that it is impossible to know
what's on my disks and that in the dilemma of giving the OTs and
NOTs back to me or keeping material that is obviously not included
in the courts' seizure decision, she chooses the latter. A very
cowardy decision I must say, but there it is. I'll be appealing
it tomorrow.

Z


---
oracle@everywhere: The ephemeral source of the eternal truth...