Path: netnews.worldnet.att.net!hunter.premier.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!enews.sgi.com!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!cph-1.news.DK.net!dkuug!dknet!funny.bahnhof.se!seunet!news2.swip.net!mn6.swip.net!mn5.swip.net!news From: Zenon Panoussis Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Flooding the court with motions, bleeding the kult of money Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:08:29 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 79 Message-ID: <326F4E2D.4630@dodo.pp.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup88-1-5.swipnet.se Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-User: s-40153 X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 [nl] (Win16; I) CC: dm@dma.se, hkk@netcom.com, Zenon Panoussis Here we go again. The CoS has now motioned 1. that all material by which I infringe upon RTC's copyright be taken into custody, no matter where it is found, i.e. either it is in my direct possession or not. The way this motion is worded and in conjunction with some of the supporting arguments it could even be interpreted to include the parliament's and other authorities' copies; 2. that I shall be obliged under penalty to hand over to the bailiff any such material that I have control or influence over; 3. that I shall be obliged under penalty to hand over the names and addresses of people that "infringing material has been handed to". Again, this wording could be interpreted to include the names of the people that have received OTs and NOTs from other sources than me, and which are unknown to me; and 4. that the court decides the motion without my prior hearing. I once wrote in a motion to the bailiff that Magnusson and Leander have no honour and that I spit on their name. They pretended not to understand and answered that I should know that everyone is entitled to a lawyer. I do understand that. The reason I spit on their name is that they have no honour *in* their defence of the rights of their client. Magnusson and Leander and the (probably scieno) spook Wilhelm Dahlborn let the CoS' American lawyers dictate their actions in Swedish courts, thereby ridiculing themselves. That's why they have no dignity, no integrity and no self-respect, not to mention respect for the law they are supposed to serve. Spit. None of the above motions has any grounds in Swedish law. I will bet anyone one legal NOTs pack that all motions will be denied, or most probably rejected (i.e. without consideration of their merits). Number 4 has already been denied: the court has communicated the motions to my lawyer and given her time to comment them. What the matter seems to be, is that they still refuse to realize what the Swedish principle of publicity is doing to them. They want to maintain a position where they can claim that they did everything in their power to prevent the OTs and NOTs from spreading, believing that that would convince any American court to still consider the OTs and NOTs as trade secrets, irrespective of the fact that they are freely available from Sweden. Well, I think it is a game lost already. But even if that game is already lost, I feel provoked by the fact that I don't seem to be able to make these people realize the fact. The new RTC motions indicate that I should put the CoS into more intensive classes. While they are considering to demand the change of the Swedish constitution, I am considering to have them repeat all the lessons of the past month, maybe with some additional excercises. It is my deep belief that even the most stupid pupils will learn, if only enough energy is put into teaching them. Z --- oracle@everywhere: The ephemeral source of the eternal truth...