Path: netnews.worldnet.att.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!nntp-oslo.UNINETT.no!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!mn5.swip.net!news From: Zenon Panoussis Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Today's bulletin Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 05:10:47 +0100 Organization: - Lines: 186 Message-ID: <3287F8C7.1E7E@dodo.pp.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup121-3-3.swipnet.se Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-User: s-40153 X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 [nl] (Win16; I) CC: dm@dma.se, hkk@netcom.com, Zenon Panoussis Monday 11 (never mind the time stamp). In the course of time, first Keith and then Grady, received official copies of public NOTs from Sweden. Not from the parliament, but from the Chancellor of Justice and from the primary court respectively (we do believe in the freedom of choice in this country). On October 25, the Honourable Servant of the Law Mr. Hogan filed a brief, claiming that these copies are forgeries. This morning I received a phone call, informing me that the primary court copy had been stolen and replaced by forgeries. The scienos never learn, I thought. I went to the court and checked for myself. Quite right, all what was left of the NOTs was the first page. The rest had been replaced by other scientology crap. Nota bene, not any crap in general, but scientology crap. The court staff had noticed the fact themselves and hit the alarm. The dear scienos, that have been borrowing the document "for reading", had stolen it. What they didn't count on, was that there would be a safe-bound and sealed forgery-proof copy around. Such a copy happened, by pure coincidence, to be in my hand when I went to the court. The court clerk received a copy of her original document, stamped and sealed for genuineness by herself. No question of forgeries, and the NOTs are back where they belong. As an extra bonus we have some of Hubbard's non-secret policy letters in public file. So, after the parliament theft, came the court theft. What next? Reasonably, the Chancellor of Justice theft. And to the Chancellor I went. A scieno was blocking the documents, "reading". I had to wait at a café nearby until the office closed and he left, whereafter I was admitted in to check. Yes, you guessed it right. The original was stolen and replaced by crap here too. But after the theft at the parliament, the Chancellor's office had taken precautions. Out of the safe came a safety copy of the original NOTs. The theft became apparent without any need of me to prove anything, and the original document is back in its place here too. They were smart those scienos, weren't they? They continued to read-block a document that they knew was forged, just so that nobody would notice the forgery or suspect them for it. What this strategy lead to instead, was that their admission of guilt became apparent to all. Servant of the Law, Honourable Mr Hogan (I trust Grady can fill in the rest of the titles), I am sorry to inform you that your noble plans of eating the cake and having it have failed again. Please make new plans. The hour got late and I didn't have time to check the Department of Justice NOTs. Is there anyone out there that wants to bet one crown that they have been replaced? I give a 1:100 odd and your curiosity will be stilled tomorrow. * You know now how eager the media are for sensation. And I have to tell you that Sweden is not too well accustomed to repeated thefts of public documents from state authorities. The discovery of two more thefts over and above the previous one, and especially considering that they occured at the offices of the guardians of the law, well, that is sensation in our provincial end of the world. Consequently I had once again to axle the task of appearing on TV, for the fourth time in two weeks, to tell people what I think of the CoS. Later in the evening, at a bar, I had the opportunity to assert that the people do watch television and that my public smearing of the CoS really does have the intended effect. I have no privacy any more, but I have a lot of fans instead. The CoS seems to have none. TV has no monopoly to the news. Aftonbladet reported today the CoS' failures in persuading the bailiff to raid the parliament. Magnusson, why do you have to humiliate yoursel- ah, forget it. I've asked you before. Berlingske Tidende, a major Danish paper, run an article yesterday. Well, kind of more than just an article. Full-width top-front-page introduction and two full inner pages. BT (not "Body Thetan") is not a tabloid; two pages are almost half a book. It will take 629 issues of Freedom magazine to wash away half the damage done to the CoS by this article. The article referred the OTs and NOTs quite extensively. While the BT journalists were still working on their article, the scienos visited them uninvited and delivered a dossier containing proof of my crimes and debts and general bad character. Some people call that "dead agenting" by an incomprehensible term. At my explicit request, the paper published these deadly facts, thus giving the readers the opportunity to draw their own conclusions on the characters of everyone involved. * OK, the scienos are fighting for their life in many fronts, and they might have lost a battle on the document-stealing field, or another on the media field. But what about the main battle, the legal one that is fought in court? There, they won today. I'm sure you remember that last week they lost in primary court, having all three of their (remaining) motions denied. You will also remember that they appealed. The appeal was hopeless and at that point I was really counting on being able to recover legal costs for the intermediate procedure at the court of appeals. I am sure that all of you would have enjoyed a message saying that the bailiff had collected my legal costs from the scieno lawyers. And what happens instead? The court of appeals just denies the scienos' appeal in one single day. All three motions. I get neither the time nor the opportunity to file a brief before the denial. Result: no legal costs, no collecting. I must admit, I am extremely disappointed. * I have plans of sending information about the parliament theft, the primary court theft and the Chancellor of Justice theft to the nazi authorities in Bavaria, that so wrongly accuse the poor scienos of being untrustworthy civil servants. Does anyone have suggestions on just what authorities would like to have copies of the police reports? And did anyone say that the "snow white" GO-people have been disposed of by the law-abiding OSA-people? Please repeat, I can't hear you well. * In the files of the Chancellor of Justice I found a letter from some Carlos J. Moorhead, written on the letter-head of the Congress of the United States and addressed to the speaker of the Swedish parliament, in which the said Moorhead requests (orders, if you allow for diplomatic speech) the "immediate return" of the parliament's CoS material to the RTC. You didn't get it? I'll repeat it: Some foreign citizen has used the letter-head of his country's legislative body to tell the head of our legislative body, that the latter legislative body should break the laws it has first passed and then upheald for 200 years, because the contrary would displease the said foreign citizen and his campaign- contributing voters. I will post the full text of that letter separately. I expect that the US citizens that feel that this Moorhead has abused his position to misrepresent and humiliate his country should be told so by the media of that country. * For constant fun, stay tuned at ARS: the intergalactic Big Win station of everyday surprises. Z --- oracle@everywhere: The ephemeral source of the eternal truth...